Further analysis of simulation data for the Populationconsumption model demonstrates how humanity has historically sought out the most options for living with more people than we have. A simulation of 7,150 "habitable worlds" (options matching the criteria on p.1) show a cloudlike distribution when plotted as shown below. In the graph,

Unique to our historic trajectory is the decrease in available worlds over time. The following graph shows this, where the worlds are limited to those with:
Roll over the graph to see a closeup. 
The second constraint is more general than the first. As total footprint increases, the number of maximum environments decreases, thus reducing the total number of habitable worlds as shown below. 
The following graph shows how the distances to both the center of habitable worlds ("Hab Center") and the center of habitable worlds with populations greater than ours ("Pop Center") as calculated using the simulation. The positions of Hab Center and Pop Center change because worlds not meeting their respective criteria become impossible and disappear. Note that the projected year that we might reach the Hab Center (using a thirdorder polynomial curve fit) matches when the Best case projection approaches the maximum population and happiness. Roll over the graph to see a closeup. It shows that we appear to have gotten as close as we can to the Pop Center. 
The speed that we move varies with how close we are to the centers, as shown below, along with curve fits suggesting that there is a defining relationship between distance and speed. 
To test whether we are actually aiming at the centers of worlds, the following graph shows the difference in viewed angles between the path being taken and the two centers of worlds as they were seen at the beginning of the path. In other words, the order of events is thus:
We are correctly aiming at a center of worlds if the target angle is 0. Roll over the graph to see a closeup. 
The following graph shows how the direction angles have changed since 1700. 
The following graph summarizes other basic elements of the model, using total footprint as the determining variable:
Note that the putative population peak occurs close to where Worlds Pop intersects Happiness Limit. Roll over the image to see a projection of population beyond 2013: it approaches the limit, moves away, and approaches again, in an infinite set of oscillations ("popscillation"). This projection is based on a simulation starting in 2013, where the Pop Center is targeted and the speed follows the curve fit of speed to distance from the Hab Center. 
History and projections of variables from 2013 are shown below. The graph shows values of population, footprint, life expectancy, and economy (square of happy environments) that are normalized to what they were in 2013. Actual values of happiness are also shown. Roll over the image to see a closeup of LOG(F/h) vs. LOG(Ppop/h). 
Related pages:PopulationConsumption v4 Main Page Popscillation (blog post) 
© Copyright 2014 Bradley Jarvis. All rights reserved.